|
|
Post by Claire Voyant on Mar 24, 2006 14:20:44 GMT
Yay! I can't wait to see how the new show handles historical periods. Hopefully as well as they've handled the future.  |
|
|
|
Post by Fitz Kreiner on Mar 24, 2006 14:41:38 GMT
you're in for a treat, it was handled brilliantly.
you should enjoy it, very well written, acted and just great!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Doc on Mar 24, 2006 15:34:29 GMT
This episode is FANTASTIC. And most of the episodes after this one are even better (and I am including AOL/WW3 in that group... I just liked those episodes for some strange reason).
|
|
|
|
Post by Claire Voyant on Mar 26, 2006 14:07:09 GMT
you're in for a treat, it was handled brilliantly. you should enjoy it, very well written, acted and just great! I loved Gwenyth. I was sad that she died. She would have made a great companion with her psychic abilities and her Victorian sensibilities. Callow was wonderful as Charles thingyens. [That's D i c k e n s. D**n filter.] ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Fitz Kreiner on Mar 26, 2006 15:14:33 GMT
told you it was good! ;D it is a good episode, and there are some more greats to come!  |
|
|
|
Post by Meddling Monkey on Mar 26, 2006 15:15:07 GMT
What the Dickens? ;D
Yes, these filters can be annoying (and amusing) at times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Claire Voyant on Mar 26, 2006 15:20:12 GMT
told you it was good! ;D it is a good episode, and there are some more greats to come! It was great. Although, I thought it was interesting that at the end, Rose is concerned about changing history, even though it's her first time in the past and the doctor hasn't made any warnings about changing history. Yet later, she'll not worry about changing history when it concerns her father. |
|
|
|
Post by Fitz Kreiner on Mar 26, 2006 16:18:43 GMT
yes, i know what you mean, i think its meant to come from a morality aspect, in that Rose doesnt think that its ethical to have the dead be occupied by the Gelth
|
|
|
|
Post by John Darnacan on Mar 26, 2006 22:58:07 GMT
Actually, I've come to believe that many politicians are Gelth, at least from the neck up. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Slagathor on Mar 27, 2006 12:59:40 GMT
I think I noticed a cut. I think they cut out the part where the Doctor admires Rose in her dress. Am I wrong?
I'm sure the Doc will know.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Doc on Mar 27, 2006 15:10:30 GMT
They did cut the scene where Rose reappears from the wardrobe room. The Doctor tells Rose she is beautiful. Then Rose asks the Doctor if he is going to change. He makes a reference to his jumper or something. It kind of ruins the joke later when Dickens is not pleased with the Doctor's clothing; and, the Doctor asks "What's wrong with this jumper?"
They also took a few seconds off the beginning of the next scene where Rose does her Neil Armstrong impersonation with her one small step into the past. Just the very beginning of that scene was cut. The step into the snow is still there though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Claire Voyant on Mar 28, 2006 1:30:25 GMT
They did cut the scene where Rose reappears from the wardrobe room. The Doctor tells Rose she is beautiful. Then Rose asks the Doctor if he is going to change. He makes a reference to his jumper or something. It kind of ruins the joke later when Dickens is not pleased with the Doctor's clothing; and, the Doctor asks "What's wrong with this jumper?" They also took a few seconds off the beginning of the next scene where Rose does her Neil Armstrong impersonation with her one small step into the past. Just the very beginning of that scene was cut. The step into the snow is still there though. I did think those two scenes were odd. Now I know why. The SciFi Channel should keep their hands off.  We waited a year to see these shows! They shouldn't mess with them! |
|
